Edward A. Ganey, Jr. v. Joseph L. Hamilton Aaron J. Johnson
Edward A. Ganey, Jr. v. Joseph L. Hamilton Aaron J. Johnson
Opinion
929 F.2d 692
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward A. GANEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph L. HAMILTON; Aaron J. Johnson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7511.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 20, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-339-CRT-F)
Edward A. Ganey, Jr., appellant pro se.
Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Edward A. Ganey, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ganey v. Hamilton, CA-90-339-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.