U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Francis Russell Holley v. Robert L. White, Jr., C/o P.H.P. Corporation Trust, Incorporated

Francis Russell Holley v. Robert L. White, Jr., C/o P.H.P. Corporation Trust, Incorporated
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 20, 1991
929 F.2d 692; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12580; 1991 WL 40876 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Francis Russell Holley v. Robert L. White, Jr., C/o P.H.P. Corporation Trust, Incorporated

Opinion

929 F.2d 692
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Francis Russell HOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert L. WHITE, Jr., c/o P.H.P. Corporation Trust,
Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-7515.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-90-123-HAR)

Francis Russell Holley, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Francis Russell Holley noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.