U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Jimmy Eoae Hamrick v. Raymond M. Muncy, Attorney General of Virginia

Jimmy Eoae Hamrick v. Raymond M. Muncy, Attorney General of Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 11, 1991
930 F.2d 23; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10918; 1991 WL 52498 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Jimmy Eoae Hamrick v. Raymond M. Muncy, Attorney General of Virginia

Opinion

930 F.2d 23
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jimmy Eoae HAMRICK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Raymond M. MUNCY, Attorney General of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-6652.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 16, 1990.
Decided April 11, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-89-747-R)

Jimmy Eoae Hamrick, appellant pro se.

Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jimmy Eoae Hamrick seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hamrick v. Muncy, CA-89-747-R (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.