Stephens v. Blankenship
Stephens v. Blankenship
Opinion
933 F.2d 1002
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frizell STEPHENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.D. BLANKENSHIP, Warden, P.L. Huffman, Assistant Warden of
Treatment, K. Polensky, Treatment Supervisor, Mr. Johnson,
Counselor, R.A. Young, Regional Administrator, R.A. Lipsner,
Manager of Classification & Record, Lou Ann White, Manager,
Court & Legal Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6547.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 6, 1991.
Decided May 23, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-560-R)
Frizell Stephens, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Frizell Stephens appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stephens v. Blankenship, CA-90-560-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 28, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.