Jo-Ann Marshburn v. Harry Jones
Jo-Ann Marshburn v. Harry Jones
Opinion
934 F.2d 319
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jo-Ann MARSHBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harry JONES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-1147.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 9, 1991.
Decided May 28, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Norman P. Ramsey, District Judge. (CA-87-3372-R)
Jo-Ann Marshburn, appellant pro se.
Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., Michael Propst, Office of Field Legal Services, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jo-Ann Marshburn appeals from the district court's order which denied her motion to reopen her Federal Tort Claims Act action against a postal service employee. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marshburn v. Jones, CA-87-3372-R (D.Md. Oct. 5, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.