U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Herman Shoop v. Flat Gap Mining Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Herman Shoop v. Flat Gap Mining Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1991
934 F.2d 320; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21625; 1991 WL 87134 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Herman Shoop v. Flat Gap Mining Company, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Opinion

934 F.2d 320
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Herman SHOOP, Petitioner,
v.
FLAT GAP MINING COMPANY, Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 91-2611.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 6, 1991.
Decided May 28, 1991.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (88-2760-BLA)

Herman Shoop, petitioner pro se.

Harry Ashby Dickerson, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, Va., Priscilla Anne Schwab, Barbara J. Johnson, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

DISMISSED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Herman Shoop seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901 et seq. Our review of the record discloses that Shoop noted this appeal outside the 60-day appeal period established by 33 U.S.C. Sec. 921(c). See also 20 C.F.R. Secs. 802.406 and 802.410(a). Petitioner's failure to note a timely appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. See Adkins v. Director, OWCP, 889 F.2d 1360 (4th Cir. 1989). We therefore grant respondent's motion and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.