Westcott v. Herndon
Westcott v. Herndon
Opinion
935 F.2d 1289
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Thomas WESTCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Elamanus HERNDON, Mason W. Waters, Olen C. Brake, Jr., Ruth
Ogle, Ellis Williams, Co V, Kenneth Sharp, Co III, Allen
Fuller, Co III, individually and in their official
capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7086.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 19, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-90-1722-MJG)
James Thomas Westcott, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James Thomas Westcott appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Westcott v. Herndon, CA-90-1722-MJG (D.Md. Mar. 26, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.