James E. Bowles v. Edward Murray, David K. Smith
James E. Bowles v. Edward Murray, David K. Smith
Opinion
940 F.2d 651
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James E. BOWLES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY, David K. Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7570.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 7, 1991.
Decided July 30, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-331-R)
James E. Bowles, appellant pro se.
William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
James E. Bowles appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bowles v. Murray, CA-90-331-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.