U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Harold Emanuel v. North Carolina Parole Commission Attorney General of North...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 27, 1991

941 F.2d 1206; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23811 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

941 F.2d 1206

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
HAROLD EMANUEL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA PAROLE COMMISSION; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH
CAROLINA; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents-Appellees.
HAROLD EMANUEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MICKEY HOBSON, Parole Case Analyst; NORTH CAROLINA PAROLE
COMMISSION; JAMES G. MARTIN, Governor of North Carolina and
their insurance company, named John Doe, individual and
official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 90-6939 & 91-6750

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 12, 1991
Decided: August 27, 1991

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge; Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-663-HC, CA-90-632-CRT-D)

Harold Emanuel, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Harold Emanuel appeals the dismissal of his habeas petition and the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous. Having reviewed the records and the district court's opinions, we find no error in the court's reasoning or in its disposition of these actions. Emanuel v. North Carolina Parole Comm'n, CA-90663-HC (E.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 1990); Emanuel v. Hobson, CA-90-632CRT-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1990). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal in No. 90-6939, and affirm in No. 91-6750. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 90-6939-DISMISSED

No. 91-6750-AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.