Dominique Whitlock v. Plageman, Superintendent, Virginia Department of Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Dominique Whitlock v. Plageman, Superintendent, Virginia Department of Corrections, 943 F.2d 50 (4th Cir. 1991)
1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25509; 1991 WL 172727

Dominique Whitlock v. Plageman, Superintendent, Virginia Department of Corrections

Opinion

943 F.2d 50

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dominique WHITLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PLAGEMAN, Superintendent, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6090.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 1991.
Decided Sept. 9, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-364-R)

Dominique Whitlock, appellant pro se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Dominique Whitlock appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Whitlock v. Plageman, CA-91-364-R (W.D.Va. May 23, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished