United States v. Shawn P. Grant
United States v. Shawn P. Grant
Opinion
946 F.2d 887
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Shawn P. GRANT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-7582.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 13, 1991.
Decided Oct. 3, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-170)
Shawn P. Grant, appellant pro se.
Eric William Ruschky, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, S.C., for appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Shawn P. Grant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Crim P. 33. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grant, CR-89-170 (D.S.C. Apr. 16, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.