U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1991

Frederick Williams, Jr. v. Margaret B. Baker, Clerk, Henrico County Circuit Court

Frederick Williams, Jr. v. Margaret B. Baker, Clerk, Henrico County Circuit Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 7, 1991
946 F.2d 888; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29167; 1991 WL 197397 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Frederick Williams, Jr. v. Margaret B. Baker, Clerk, Henrico County Circuit Court

Opinion

946 F.2d 888

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frederick WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Margaret B. BAKER, Clerk, Henrico County Circuit Court,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-7114.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 29, 1991.
Decided Oct. 7, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-90-1739-N)

Frederick Williams, Jr., appellant pro se.

James Thomas Moore, III, County Attorney's Office, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Frederick Williams, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Baker, CA-90-1739-N (E.D.Va. May 10, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.