Arnold L. Paige v. Joseph L. Hamilton Hazel W. Keith
Arnold L. Paige v. Joseph L. Hamilton Hazel W. Keith
Opinion
948 F.2d 1282
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Arnold L. PAIGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph L. HAMILTON; Hazel W. Keith, Defendants-Appellees.
Decided 91-7687.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.
Nov. 19, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-428-CRT-7-F)
Arnold L. Paige, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Arnold L. Paige appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Paige v. Hamilton, No. CA-91-428-CRT-7-F (E.D.N.C. July 16, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
In view of our disposition of this appeal, we deny Paige's motion for an extension of time to seek counsel
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.