Maxine Y. White v. William Smith Kirk
Maxine Y. White v. William Smith Kirk
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Maxine Y. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William Smith KIRK, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-6625.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.
Decided Nov. 20, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-91-281-CRT-BR)
Maxine Y. White, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Maxine Y. White appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that there was no abuse of discretion and this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Kirk, No. CA-91-281-CRTBR (E.D.N.C. July 15, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.