William Thornton Blakey v. Lou Cei
William Thornton Blakey v. Lou Cei
Opinion
952 F.2d 395
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Thornton BLAKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lou CEI, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-7319.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 1991.
Decided Dec. 26, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. (CA-91-156-R), James C. Turk, Chief District Judge.
William Thornton Blakey, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
William Thornton Blakey appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Blakey v. Cei, No. CA-91-156-R (W.D.Va. Oct. 11, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished