Joseph Lee Melvin v. Lee Otis Bright
Joseph Lee Melvin v. Lee Otis Bright
Opinion
952 F.2d 396
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joseph Lee MELVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lee Otis BRIGHT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-6326.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 1991.
Decided Dec. 27, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (CA-91-563-H), Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.
Joseph Lee Melvin, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Lee Melvin appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Melvin v. Bright, No. CA-91-563-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished