United States v. Byron Carlton Cumber
United States v. Byron Carlton Cumber
Opinion
952 F.2d 397
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Byron Carlton CUMBER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-7309.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 1991.
Decided Dec. 26, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. (CR-88-26-2-7, CA-91-52-7), W. Earl Britt, District Judge.
Byron Carlton Cumber, appellant pro se.
Robert Daniel Boyce, Thomas P. Swain, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Byron Carlton Cumber appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cumber, Nos. CR-88-26-2-7, CA-91-52-7 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.