Harris v. Robinson
Harris v. Robinson
Opinion
955 F.2d 41
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ricky Ricardo HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bishop L. ROBINSON; Richard Lanham, Sr.; Lloyd Waters;
Bruce Stout; R. Rowe; Lenora Jones; W. Eric
Sohr; Robert A. Harleston; Thomas
Corcoran, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6695.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.
Decided Feb. 13, 1992.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore, No. CA-91-2200-N, Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge.
Ricky Ricardo Harris, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Ricardo Harris appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Robinson, No. CA-91-2200-N (D.Md. Nov. 21, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.