Willard J. Rice v. Chester D. Norton Charles Hymiller

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Willard J. Rice v. Chester D. Norton Charles Hymiller, 958 F.2d 368 (4th Cir. 1992)
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12487; 1992 WL 49939

Willard J. Rice v. Chester D. Norton Charles Hymiller

Opinion

958 F.2d 368

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Willard J. RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Chester D. NORTON; Charles Hymiller, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6127.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 2, 1992.
Decided March 18, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-91-144-JFM)

Willard J. Rice, appellant pro se.

Robert Charles Verderaime, Verderaime & Dubois, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Willard J. Rice appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rice v. Norton, No. CA-91-144-JFM (D.Md. Jan. 4, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Status
Unpublished