Anthony Ray Solomon v. C.J. Rainbolt, Officer P. Dieheart, Officer G.W. Gowin, Officer
Anthony Ray Solomon v. C.J. Rainbolt, Officer P. Dieheart, Officer G.W. Gowin, Officer
Opinion
958 F.2d 369
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony Ray SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.J. RAINBOLT, Officer; P. Dieheart, Officer; G.W. Gowin,
Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6084.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 2, 1992.
Decided March 17, 1992.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91-221-CRT-H)
Anthony Ray Solomon, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Ray Solomon filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.