U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Marie J. Clinton v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service

Marie J. Clinton v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 19, 1992
962 F.2d 6; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16908; 1992 WL 104821 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Marie J. Clinton v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service

Opinion

962 F.2d 6

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Marie J. CLINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-1233.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 14, 1992
Decided: May 19, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Marie J. Clinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert William Jaspen, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Robert Lewis Sawicki, Office of Field Legal Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Marie J. Clinton appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Clinton v. Frank, No. CA-91-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We grant Clinton's motion to amend her response to Appellee's informal brief

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.