U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Ganey v. Barnett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 15, 1992

962 F.2d 6; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16913; 1992 WL 102583 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

962 F.2d 6

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward A. GANEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Richard RHODES; Thomas E. Clark; Addison Warren Sewell, Plaintiffs,
v.
T. L. BARNETT; R. E. Lee; C. M. Creecy, Jr.; Lieutenant
Troy Willis; Frank A. Evans; Joseph Hamilton; Aaron J.
Johnson; Unknown Defendants, and all other unknown in
active concert or otherwise, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6294.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 4, 1992
Decided: May 15, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-90-223-CRT-BR)

Edward A. Ganey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Edward A. Ganey, Jr. appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ganey v. Barnett, No. CA-90-223-CRT-BR (E.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 1990 and Feb. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.