Gantt v. Ford
Gantt v. Ford
Opinion
962 F.2d 6
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George W. GANTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patric FORD; E. T. Bowling, in their individual and
official capacities, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Larry DONNELL; Wilis Mitchell, in their individual and
official capacities, Defendants.
No. 92-6019.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 4, 1992
Decided: May 21, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91-1254-JH)
George W. Gantt, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
George W. Gantt appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gantt v. Ford, No. CA-91-1254-JH (D. Md. Dec. 17, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.