Ronald Glenn Reichner v. Warden Taylor Doug Shaffens
Ronald Glenn Reichner v. Warden Taylor Doug Shaffens
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald Glenn REICHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Warden TAYLOR; Doug Shaffens, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6291.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 4, 1992
Decided: May 15, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-91-522-R)
Ronald Glenn Reichner, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Glenn Reichner appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reichner v. Taylor, No. CA-91-522-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 5, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.