U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Robert Unger, Jr. v. Geoffrey W. Cole

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 8, 1992

962 F.2d 7; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17297; 1992 WL 95338 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert UNGER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Geoffrey W. COLE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6164.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 31, 1992
Decided: May 8, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-92-100-R)

Robert Unger, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Robert Unger, Jr., appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Unger v. Cole, No. CA-92-100-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 4, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

The appropriate vehicle for challenging length or duration of a state prison sentence is a habeas corpus petition. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 490 (1973); 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Unger would have to exhaust his state remedies before pursuing a federal habeas petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.