Byron J. Stevens v. John McLamm William K. Jones
Byron J. Stevens v. John McLamm William K. Jones
Opinion
963 F.2d 368
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Byron J. STEVENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John McLAMM; William K. Jones, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6336.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 4, 1992.
Decided May 18, 1992.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, No. CA-90-90-CRT, Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.
Byron J. Stevens, appellant pro se.
Jacob Leonard Safron, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Byron J. Stevens appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stevens v. McLamm, No. CA-90-90-CRT (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.