Stanley Joseph Callis v. Edward W. Murray
Stanley Joseph Callis v. Edward W. Murray
Opinion
968 F.2d 1211
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Stanley Joseph CALLIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 91-7290.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 29, 1992
Decided: July 13, 1992
Stanley Joseph Callis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Joseph Callis seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Callis v. Murray, No. CA-91-343-R (E.D. Va. Sept. 17, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.