Edward Combs v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Edward Combs v. William Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Opinion
972 F.2d 339
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward COMBS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 92-6592.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 6, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-92-507-HAR)
Edward Combs, Appellant Pro Se.
Sarah Elizabeth Page, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
Affirmed.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Edward Combs appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Combs v. Smith, No. CA-92-507-HAR (D. Md. May 11, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.