Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Charles H. Holloway v. John H. Painter Bobby Haulk J. A. Rogers

Charles H. Holloway v. John H. Painter Bobby Haulk J. A. Rogers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 7, 1992
972 F.2d 340; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26784; 1992 WL 188130 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Charles H. Holloway v. John H. Painter Bobby Haulk J. A. Rogers

Opinion

972 F.2d 340

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles H. HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John H. PAINTER; Bobby Haulk; J. A. Rogers, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6302.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 11, 1992
Decided: August 7, 1992

Charles H. Holloway, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Charles H. Holloway appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holloway v. Painter, No. CA-92-49-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑