U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Royal v. Hadden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 31, 1992

972 F.2d 341; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26763; 1992 WL 180722 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

972 F.2d 341

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
VALGENE ROYAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Anthony RICHARDSON, Plaintiff,
v.
J. T. HADDEN, Warden; L. Moore; J. Brand, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Jackie TAYLOR; R. Ellis, Lieutenant; D. Martin,
Lieutenant; Jerry GAUGHANS, Defendants.

No. 91-6324.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: July 31, 1992

Valgene Royal, Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Bruce Conely, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Valgene Royal appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his Bivens* action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Royal v. Hadden, No. CA-90-520-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.