Daniel R. Tinsley v. David A. Williams Attorney General of Virginia
Daniel R. Tinsley v. David A. Williams Attorney General of Virginia
Opinion
972 F.2d 342
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Daniel R. TINSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David A. WILLIAMS; Attorney General of Virginia,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 92-6201.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 12, 1992
Decided: August 7, 1992
Malcolm G. Crawford, Lexington, Virginia, for Appellant.
Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Daniel R. Tinsley seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Tinsley v. Williams, No. CA-91-260-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 17, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.