United States v. Avery Nathaniel Brice
United States v. Avery Nathaniel Brice
Opinion
972 F.2d 342
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Avery Nathaniel BRICE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6424.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 4, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-87-27-C)
Avery Nathaniel Brice, Appellant Pro Se.
Debra Jo Stuart, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
W.D.N.C.
Affirmed.
Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Avery Nathaniel Brice appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brice, No. CR-87-27-C (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.