U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Robert Walter Woltz, Re v. Dr. Clardy Ms. Frank-David David K. Mapp, Jr. Cody Benn

Robert Walter Woltz, Re v. Dr. Clardy Ms. Frank-David David K. Mapp, Jr. Cody Benn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 1992
972 F.2d 345; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26398; 1992 WL 187189 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Robert Walter Woltz, Re v. Dr. Clardy Ms. Frank-David David K. Mapp, Jr. Cody Benn

Opinion

972 F.2d 345

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Walter WOLTZ, Re, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dr. CLARDY; Ms. Frank-David; David K. Mapp, Jr.; Cody
Benn, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6632.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 1992
Decided: August 6, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-778)

Robert Walter Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Robert Walter Woltz appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woltz v. Clardy, No. CA-92-778 (E.D. Va. June 5, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.