U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Billy T. Robinette v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Billy T. Robinette v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 15, 1992
974 F.2d 1331; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29671; 1992 WL 225302 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Billy T. Robinette v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

974 F.2d 1331

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Billy T. ROBINETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-2693.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 1992
Decided: Sept. 15, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-88-84-B)

Terry Gene Kilgore, Gate City, Virginia, for Appellant.

Richard Albert Lloret, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; Charlotte Jefferson Hardnett, Victor Jerry Pane, Jr., Eileen Bradley, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Billy Robinette appeals from the district court's order affirming the Secretary's decision to deny his request for Social Security benefits. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinette v. HHS, No. CA-88-84-B (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.