U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

James Nolley v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 31, 1992

974 F.2d 1331; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29658; 1992 WL 208567 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

974 F.2d 1331

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James NOLLEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-6350.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 10, 1992
Decided: August 31, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-90-424)

James Nolley, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

Dismissed.

Before SPROUSE, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

James Nolley seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Nolley v. State of South Carolina, No. CA-90-424 (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.