Benjamin B. Penick v. Edward W. Murray Attorney General of Virginia
Benjamin B. Penick v. Edward W. Murray Attorney General of Virginia
Opinion
974 F.2d 1331
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Benjamin B. PENICK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY; Attorney General of Virginia,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-7703.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 9, 1992
Decided: August 31, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-91-203-3)
Benjamin B. Penick, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
Dismissed.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin B. Penick seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Penick v. Murray, No. CA-91-203-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.