U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr. v. M. J. McDade Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Attorney General

Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr. v. M. J. McDade Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Attorney General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 24, 1992
976 F.2d 725; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38240; 1992 WL 235541 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr. v. M. J. McDade Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Attorney General

Opinion

976 F.2d 725

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Stephen M. CHRZAN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
M. J. MCDADE; Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Attorney
General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-6691.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 1992
Decided: September 24, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-91-131-6)

Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Stephen M. Chrzan, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Chrzan v. McDade, No. CA-91-131-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.