U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Hooper v. Blankenship

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 17, 1992

976 F.2d 726; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23223; 1992 WL 225870 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

976 F.2d 726

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gerald Reece HOOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W. D. BLANKENSHIP, Warden; David L. Smith, Assistant
Warden; Patricia Huffman, Assistant Warden; Karen Polinsky,
Treatment Supervisor; W. P. Ellison, Major; Jane
Richardson, Counselor; Jeff Johnson, Counselor; Ted Durr,
Counselor; R. A. Young, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6170.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 1992
Decided: Sept. 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-91-706-R)

Gerald Reece Hooper, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Gerald Reece Hooper appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hooper v. Blankenship, No. CA-91-706-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 4, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.