Paul Higgins v. L. P. Ellis Charlotte City Police Department
Paul Higgins v. L. P. Ellis Charlotte City Police Department
Opinion
976 F.2d 726
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Paul HIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L. P. ELLIS; Charlotte City Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6433.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 31, 1992
Decided: Sept. 17, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CA-91-204-C-P)
Paul Higgins, Appellant Pro Se.
Frank Bayard Aycock, III, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Paul Higgins appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Higgins v. Ellis, No. CA-91-204-C-P (W.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We note that our disposition of this appeal renders moot Higgins's request for transcripts
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished