U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Kendrick v. Virginia Parole Bd.

Kendrick v. Virginia Parole Bd.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 17, 1992
976 F.2d 726; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23216; 1992 WL 225854 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Kendrick v. Virginia Parole Bd.

Opinion

976 F.2d 726

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Daniel G. KENDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; Clarence L. Jackson, Chairman;
Lewis W. Hurst, Vice Chairman; Gail Y. Browne,
Member; Jacqueline F. Fraser, Member;
John A. Brown, Member,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6241.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 1, 1992
Decided: Sept. 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-91-588-R)

Daniel G. Kendrick, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

Daniel G. Kendrick appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kendrick v. Virginia Parole Bd., No. CA-91-588-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 21, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.