U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

James Edward Moore v. Richard Lanham, Sr., Commissioner, Maryland Division of Correction Attorney General of the State of Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 21, 1992

976 F.2d 726; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23339; 1992 WL 231050 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

976 F.2d 726

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Edward MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Richard LANHAM, Sr., Commissioner, Maryland Division of
Correction; Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-6486.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 1992
Decided: September 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-92-1062-MJG)

James Edward Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

Dismissed.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

James Moore seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), for non-exhaustion of state remedies. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Attorney General of MD, No. CA-92-1062-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 27, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.