U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

James Pouncy, Jr. v. C. L. Jackson L. Hurst J. Brown Gail Brown J. Fraser

James Pouncy, Jr. v. C. L. Jackson L. Hurst J. Brown Gail Brown J. Fraser
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 16, 1992
976 F.2d 727; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23222; 1992 WL 225816 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

James Pouncy, Jr. v. C. L. Jackson L. Hurst J. Brown Gail Brown J. Fraser

Opinion

976 F.2d 727

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James POUNCY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C. L. JACKSON; L. Hurst; J. Brown; Gail Brown; J.
Fraser, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6162.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 1992
Decided: Sept. 16, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-495)

James Pouncy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

1

James Pouncy, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pouncy v. Jackson, No. CA-91-495 (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.