U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Robert Riddick v. Maryland Parole Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 18, 1992

976 F.2d 727; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23185; 1992 WL 229361 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert RIDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND Parole Commission, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6638.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 1992
Decided: September 18, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-92-1426-HAR)

Robert Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

Affirmed.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Robert Riddick appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Riddick v. Maryland Parole Commission, No. CA-92-1426-HAR (D. Md. June 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.