U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Edmund Junior Hargrave v. William S. Lawhon R. J. Beck L. Stiltner J. Horton C/o Childress C/o Payne Lt. Summey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 19, 1992

978 F.2d 1255; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 34476; 1992 WL 295145 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

978 F.2d 1255

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edmund Junior HARGRAVE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William S. LAWHON; R. J. Beck; L. Stiltner; J. Horton;
C/O Childress; C/O Payne; LT. Summey,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6873.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 28, 1992
Decided: October 19, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-92-603-R)

Edmund Junior Hargrave, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Edmund Junior Hargrave appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hargrave v. Lawhon, No. CA-92-603-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.