U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Withrow v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 27, 1992

978 F.2d 1257; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 34464; 1992 WL 312206 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

978 F.2d 1257

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James T. WITHROW, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Edward W. Murray,
Director; Lou Ann White, Court and Legal; Carolyn G. Funn,
Classification Specialist; L. W. Turnage, Institutional
Counselor; Barbara Taylor, Record Manager; John Russell,
Institutional Counselor; E. C. Morris; Lewis Cei, Doctor;
C. D. Larsen, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6722.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 7, 1992
Decided: October 27, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-9-R)

James T. Withrow, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

Affirmed.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

James T. Withrow appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Withrow v. Virginia Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-91-9-R (W.D. Va. June 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.