Peter Emmanuel Bernard v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. C. Hill
Peter Emmanuel Bernard v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. C. Hill
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Peter Emmanuel BERNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Clarence L. JACKSON, JR.; C. Hill, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6833.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 28, 1992
Decided: October 28, 1992
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-92-233-R)
Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.
Reneen Evat Hewlett, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Peter Emmanuel Bernard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bernard v. Jackson, No. CA-92-233-R (W.D. Va. July 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.