U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1992

Edge Broadcasting Company, T/a Power 94 v. United States of America Federal Communications Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 1992 · Widener, Chapman, Haden, Southern, Virginia

5 F.3d 59; 70 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 765; 20 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1904; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2735; 1993 WL 328914 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Robert David Kamenshine, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, argued' (Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anthony J. Steinmeyer, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington DC, Henry E. Hudson, U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, Nancy Stanley, F.C.C., Washington, DC, on brief), for defendants-appellants., Conrad Moss Shumadine, Willeox & Savage, P.C., Norfolk, VA, argued (Walter D. Kelley, Jr., Cecelia A. Weschler, Willeox & Savage, P.C., Norfolk, VA, Wayne G. Souza, Croshaw, Siegel, Beale, Hauser & Lewis, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Burke v. City of Charleston (District Court, D. South Carolina 1995)
Edge Broadcasting Company, T/a Power 94 v. United States of America Federal Communications Commission (4th Cir. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.