U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Lyman Alexander Brown, III v. Frank Drew

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1993

986 F.2d 1412; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9215; 1993 WL 51141 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

986 F.2d 1412

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lyman Alexander BROWN, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Frank DREW, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-7271.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 26, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-92-520-2)

Lyman Alexander Brown, III, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Lyman Alexander Brown, III, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.