U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1993

Kenneth T. Bosley v. Margaret M. Bosley, Individually and as Parents and Next...

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 16, 1993

986 F.2d 1412; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9196 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

986 F.2d 1412

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kenneth T. BOSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Margaret M. BOSLEY, Individually and as Parents and Next
Friends of Daniel M. Bosley, III, a minor; Daniel M.
Bosley, Jr., Individually and as Parents and Next Friends of
Daniel M. Bosley, III, a minor; Daniel M. Bosley, Sr.;
Barbara A. Jones, Defendants-Appellees.
Kenneth T. BOSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND, A Local County Body, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 92-2232, 92-2333.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993
Decided: February 16, 1993

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Benson E. Legg, District Judges. (CA-92-2215-JFM, CA-91-1290)

Kenneth T. Bosley, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael J. Moran, County Attorney's Office, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee Baltimore County.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth T. Bosley appeals from the district court's orders dismissing two actions which Bosley attempted to bring under civil rights statutes. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bosley v. Bosley, No. CA-92-2215JFM (D. Md. Sept. 4, 1992); Bosley v. Baltimore County, Maryland, No. CA-91-1290 (D. Md. Sept. 29, 1992).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

We do not read the decisions of the district court as judgments on the merits of any claim arising under state law

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.