George W. Gantt v. Lieutanant Pressbury Benett Sergeant Hardee Mark G. Griffin
George W. Gantt v. Lieutanant Pressbury Benett Sergeant Hardee Mark G. Griffin
Opinion
989 F.2d 492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George W. GANTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lieutanant PRESSBURY; Benett; Sergeant Hardee; Mark G.
Griffin, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6069.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 1, 1993
Decided: March 25, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-92-3659-B)
George W. Gantt, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
George W. Gantt appeals the order of the district court continuing this case on its docket and requiring proof of exhaustion of administrative remedies. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.